An interface, by contrast, is a totally abstract set of members that can be thought of as defining a contract for conduct. The implementation of an interface is left completely to the developer.
An advantage of Abstract class over Interface
If you want to have additional functionalities for the interface, you must implement the new ones in all of the classes that implement the changed interface. The code will not work until you make the change. But if you want to have additional functions to the Abstract class, you can have default implementation. Your code still might work without many changes.
An advantage of Interface over Abstract class
A class can inherit multiple interfaces but can inherit only one class.
When to Use Abstract and When to Use Interface:
Let me explain it with reference to the scenario.Let us take a classification called Human. As it is a very general classification, I can put all the Human related common data in Abstract class.These common data could be First Name, Last Name, Gender, Education, Occupation, Residence, etc. with some functions as virtual (or overridable), e.g., an occupation which differs from human to human.
Aim of Interface: We want the implementing object to acquire this ability.
Aim of Abstraction: We want the derived object to belong to some group. Abstraction gives the Identity to the derived object.
The sentence "Object A is a Human" is more meaningful than the sentence "Object A is an object which has the ability to walk." (Human can walk, an animal, a bird, a machine - consider it is a robot ... that can also walk.)
Why I chose interfaces IEat, IWalk, IDance and ISing
I may want Object A to walk in the morning, to eat in the afternoon or to dance in the evening, or I may not be aware at a particular time what these objects should be doing. The capability of Object A at a particular time is unknown to me. Also every derived object may need not posses the quality of walking, or dancing, or singing. An infant cannot walk, as you know everybody cannot dance and sing. So I created these interfaces so that I can define the combination of these capabilities for different objects explicitly.
Refer to the image below for a more clearer view.
Take an example of .NET interfaces IDisposable or IComparable. We implement these interfaces only if necessary. We implement IDisposable mostly when we want to handle COM components and IComparable to compare and sort the objects in an Array.
If you want your class to have an Identity of Form, you must inherit Form class and you can add the ability to dispose, by implementing IDisposable, only if you want to dispose it manually.
Reusability
Let us consider the same abstract Human class which has the virtual function Eat instead of an Interface IEat.
Now I want to create a class called Bird. As a Bird can also eat, I want to reuse the function which is already there in Human class. Suppose, just because abstract Human class has the function to eat, I cannot derive a Bird class from that. I will tend to change the Bird's identity by doing so, or I may load unnecessary properties to the Bird that could be an education, or employment, or may be the last name. Even worse I may need to change the abstract Human class so as to include the common behaviors of Bird category. This is totally senseless and messes up the class and objects. Instead, I can have another Abstract class for Birds and choose to have an interface called IEat, which could be implemented by an object of Human and also an object of Bird.
Polymorphic Behavior:
Both interfaces and abstract classes are useful for component interaction. If a method requires an interface as an argument, then any object that implements that interface can be used in the argument. For example:
This method could accept any object that implemented IWidget as the widget argument, even though the implementations of IWidget might be quite different. Abstract classes also allow for this kind of polymorphism, but with a few caveats:
- Classes may inherit from only one base class, so if you want to use abstract classes to provide polymorphism to a group of classes, they must all inherit from that class.
- Abstract classes may also provide members that have already been implemented. Therefore, you can ensure a certain amount of identical functionality with an abstract class, but cannot with an interface.
Conclusion :
- Abstract class gives an Identity to the derived object.
- Interface extends the ability of an object.
- Interfaces give polymorphic behavior.
- Abstract class also gives polymorphic behavior. But it is more meaningful to say that Abstract class simplifies versioning, as the base class is flexible and inheriting class can create many versions of it by additional functions and also by implementing Interfaces.
- Interfaces and Abstract classes both promote reusability.
Here are some recommendations to help you to decide whether to use an interface or an abstract class to provide polymorphism for your components.
- If you anticipate creating multiple versions of your component, create an abstract class. Abstract classes provide a simple and easy way to version your components. By updating the base class, all inheriting classes are automatically updated with the change. Interfaces, on the other hand, cannot be changed once created. If a new version of an interface is required, you must create a whole new interface.
- If the functionality you are creating will be useful across a wide range of disparate objects, use an interface. Abstract classes should be used primarily for objects that are closely related, whereas interfaces are best suited for providing common functionality to unrelated classes.
- If you are designing small, concise bits of functionality, use interfaces. If you are designing large functional units, use an abstract class.
- If you want to provide common, implemented functionality among all implementations of your component, use an abstract class. Abstract classes allow you to partially implement your class, whereas interfaces contain no implementation for any members.
References :
CodeProjectMSDN
